Holland's draft record leaves a lot to be desired.
As every NHL fan knows, no general manager possesses a crystal ball to accurately predict the success of most players selected in an entry draft. Sometimes, even players who are deemed sure bets by scouts and pundits across the league to be disappointments.
Nevertheless, there are instances where certain players should have been scrutinized more thoroughly and potentially chosen instead. This issue is particularly evident with the Oilers' general manager, Ken Holland, as highlighted in a tweet by a man named Zach.
Zach pointed out numerous players who were available when Holland made his selections, suggesting that they would have been much better choices.
It is difficult to fathom that, after selecting Phillip Broberg, Holland disregarded other promising players such as Zegras, Boldy, Caufield, Newhook, Krebs, and Harley, to name just a few.
When considering a general manager's approach to drafting, it is crucial to understand their style and how they strive to improve their team. Do they prioritize drafting based on team needs, or do they prioritize selecting the best player available?
While I am not a general manager myself, I would personally advocate for prioritizing the best player available in the first few rounds of the draft, regardless of position.
Only time will tell whether Holland's choices will prove successful in the long run. These prospects will need time to develop and eventually make an impact on the team.
| POLL | ||
4 JUILLET | 184 ANSWERS Holland's draft record leaves a lot to be desired. Are you happy with Ken Holland as GM of the Oilers? | ||
| Yes | 133 | 72.3 % |
| No | 51 | 27.7 % |
| List of polls | ||
Latest 10 stories
