Unfortunately, a proposed plan to increase the number of games from the current 82 to 84 per season seems more like a ploy to evoke sympathy for the owners. This move disregards the health and well-being of the players and could potentially result in increased time away from their families and unnecessary physical strain. While the concept of intensifying competition between teams holds allure in theory, the NHLPA should only endorse this proposition if it proves worthwhile and adequately compensates the players for their efforts.
Let's take a closer look at the differences between the 82 and 84-game seasons:
82 games:
2 games against each team from the opposite conference (32 total games)
3 games against teams in the same conference but different divisions (24 total games)
3 games against two teams from the same division (6 total games)
4 games against the remaining 5 division rivals (20 total games)
84 games:
2 games against each team from the opposite conference (32 total games)
3 games against teams in the same conference but different divisions (24 total games)
4 games against the seven division rivals (28 total games)
These details provide a glimpse into the proposed changes, highlighting the potential impact on the season's structure.
POLL | ||
MAI 28 | 184 ANSWERS BREAKING: Bettman Set to Make Major Change to NHL's Schedule? How do you feel about an 84 game season? | ||
Yes! More hockey! | 72 | 39.1 % |
Meh | 49 | 26.6 % |
No | 63 | 34.2 % |
List of polls |